NL

SECOND LIFE TEXTILE B.V. - Leading Textile Sorting and Export Services

Gemert, Netherlands
Secondhand

Specialization

Textile sorting
Textile recycling
Wholesale secondhand textiles

Services

Sorting used clothing
Recycling textiles
Export wholesale
Bulk order supply

About Company

Company overview

Second Life Textile B.V. is a Dutch textile collector at Dieze 5, 5422 VS Gemert in North Brabant, registered with the chamber of commerce under KvK 65076850. Contact is +31 (0)6 85 527 990 and [email protected].

Read the first line of the entry carefully, because it sets what this company can and cannot do for you. Second Life Textile does not sort. It runs a container network, empties it, and sells the collected material as freight to certified sorting companies in the Netherlands and abroad. If you are looking to buy graded bales, this is not the house to call. If you want to understand where European material comes from and what is about to change about it, it is one of the more informative entries here.

The network is three hundred containers emptied across the country, producing twenty-five tonnes of textile a week. That works out at roughly 83 kg per container per week, which is a useful benchmark for anybody weighing up a collection network of their own.

It sells to sorters, and it visits them once a year

The company states that it only supplies sorting companies that work transparently, and that it visits those sorters every year so that it knows what happens to the material it delivered.

That is a supply chain audit, described in one sentence, and it is rare enough to be worth borrowing as a question. Plenty of houses in this trade work through partners: they collect but somebody else grades, or they trade but somebody else sorts. Very few of them say anything about checking on that partner. When a supplier tells you their goods come from a certified partner, the follow-up is simple and revealing. When did you last visit that site, and what did you look at? A house that goes annually will answer immediately.

The denominator problem, and why percentages in this trade rarely compare

Second Life Textile publishes its own breakdown: 50% goes on as second-hand clothing, 35% is recycled into new material such as yarn, and 15% is processed as waste.

Now put that next to the other figures published by companies in this directory. A Belgian sorter reports 73% reuse, 22% recycling and 5% energy recovery. A Dutch foundation reports 70% reuse, 20% recycling and 10% waste. A Belgian sorting house states that only 40% of original clothing is wearable at all.

Those numbers cannot all be describing the same thing, and the difference is not that one company is better than another. They are measured at different points in the chain and against different denominators. A collector counts everything that goes into a container, including the household waste and the ruined items. A sorter counts what arrives at its line, often after somebody has already screened the worst out. A figure for original bags is different again.

The practical lesson is worth more than any individual percentage. When a supplier quotes you a reuse rate, ask two questions: a percentage of what, and measured at which point in the process? Without those, a 73% and a 50% tell you nothing about each other. Anyone comparing second-hand clothing suppliers on published sustainability figures is otherwise comparing arithmetic that was never meant to line up.

UPV Textiel, and why a buyer outside the Netherlands should care

The company positions a good part of its business around UPV Textiel, the Dutch extended producer responsibility scheme for textiles. Under it, textile producers become responsible for the full life cycle of what they put on the market, including waste management, and the company expects fashion retailers to need a collection container in the shop as a result. Its offer to them covers advice, financing, placing the containers, emptying them and keeping them clean.

That matters beyond the Netherlands and beyond this one supplier. Producer responsibility schemes formalise a collection layer that used to be informal, and they change who controls the flow of material and how it is funded. For a buyer of second-hand goods the effects pull in two directions: more material is captured and documented, which is good for provenance, but a larger share of it becomes attached to producer-funded systems with their own reporting rules and their own contracted partners, which is a different negotiation from ringing up an independent collector.

You do not need a legal opinion on it. You do need to know the term, and to ask any European supplier whether their volumes sit inside or outside a producer responsibility scheme, because the answer says a lot about how stable their supply is over the next few years.

Small operational details that confirm bigger points

  • Collections run on euro 6 Sprinter vans with routes calculated by the MangoStone app from collected data, so containers that fill faster are emptied more often and quiet ones less often.
  • Everything sits in the cloud, and the supermarket hosting a container and the municipality can see in real time what was collected and when.
  • Drivers come through social return in partnership with the work company Senzer.
  • Retail partnerships with the Coop supermarket chain and the Intergamma franchise since 2021, and with PLUS since 2022. Containers are finished in the host's own branding.

Two of the deposit instructions confirm arguments made elsewhere in this directory. The first is that textiles must be handed in clean, dry and in a closed bag, and that wet textile is explicitly refused while torn, worn and lightly stained items are welcome. A collector will happily take a garment with a hole and turn away a wet one, which is the clearest possible statement that moisture, not damage, is what destroys value in a collection container.

The second is that shoes must be tied together in pairs. That is now the third company in this directory to solve pairing at the doorstep rather than at the sorting table, and it is a reliable marker of a serious operation, since unpaired shoes are nearly worthless at retail. The rest of the accepted list runs to clothing, bedding, textile bags, soft toys and curtains, while heavily soiled textile and household waste are refused. The account of how sorting houses handle incoming material picks up where this company's job ends, and the standard grade vocabulary is what a wholesale buyer will need at the next step down the chain.

Frequently asked questions

Does Second Life Textile sell graded bales?

No. It collects textile and sells it as freight to certified sorting companies in the Netherlands and abroad, so graded goods have to be bought from those sorters.

How much does the company collect?

Around twenty-five tonnes a week from three hundred containers across the Netherlands, which is roughly 83 kg per container per week.

What happens to the collected textile?

The company states that 50% goes on as second-hand clothing, 35% is recycled into new material such as yarn, and 15% is processed as waste.

What is UPV Textiel?

The Dutch extended producer responsibility scheme for textiles, under which producers become responsible for the full life cycle of their products including waste management.

What may not go into the containers?

Heavily soiled textile, household waste and wet textile. Torn, worn and lightly stained items are accepted, and shoes must be tied together in pairs.

Key Strengths

High-volume processing capacity

Established logistics network for export

Multi-grade textile sorting

Experience with European markets

Contact Information